How do I show school that my child is struggling when they seem fine in class?
Compare school, child and home accounts without trying to prove masking, then agree what to observe and what support to test.

The short answer
Do not try to win an argument about whether your child is fine or masking. Replace the verdict with comparable detail. Choose one lesson, transition or unstructured time and ask what the child is expected to do, how much prompting or imitation is involved, what work is produced and what happens immediately afterwards. Add the child's account and a short home record covering recovery, eating, sleep, communication or distress. Include easier days and note what support or demand was different. Different accounts do not prove a cause, but they can reveal hidden effort, delayed impact or a setting-specific barrier. Ask school to observe the exact situation, test one support change and review both school access and after-school cost.
- Replace words such as fine, coping and masking with specific access and effort questions.
- Keep the child's, school's and family's accounts separate before looking for a pattern.
- Record easier occasions as well as difficult ones.
- Look at prompting, imitation, participation, recovery and not only completed work.
- Agree a focused observation and a support trial rather than indefinite monitoring.
- Do not make the child display greater distress before adults take the impact seriously.
School says your child is settled, polite and completing work. At home, they cry in the car, stop speaking, refuse food, explode over a small request or cannot face the next morning.
Both accounts may be accurate.
The task is not to decide which adult has seen the "real" child. It is to understand what the school day requires, how the child gets through it and what the effort costs afterwards.
Move away from the word fine
"Fine in class" can mean several different things:
- physically present;
- quiet and not drawing attention;
- following peers;
- completing some work;
- meeting academic expectations;
- not asking for help;
- not showing distress that an adult recognises;
- participating comfortably and understanding the lesson.
Those are not equivalent.
Ask about a particular context. In science after lunch, does the child begin when the class begins? Do they understand the instruction? How many prompts are needed? Are they producing their own answer or copying the structure around them? Can they ask for clarification? What happens at the end of the lesson?
Specific questions are not a way to catch school out. Teachers may see dozens of pupils across short periods. A focused question helps them notice effort and access that quiet behaviour can conceal.
Do not make masking the starting verdict
Masking is a useful concept when a person suppresses, hides or compensates for traits in order to fit expectations. It may help explain why distress is not visible at school. It is not the only possible explanation for a home-school difference.
Other possibilities include:
- school is more predictable than home at that time of day;
- structure, peers or a particular teacher genuinely help;
- the child uses all available capacity at school and has little left afterwards;
- hunger, travel, pain, fatigue or medication timing changes later in the day;
- the difficult demand occurs only at home;
- the child feels safer expressing distress with family;
- school notices output but not the amount of prompting or internal distress;
- home and school are describing different days or different behaviours.
Say what you think may be happening, but keep it as a question to investigate. "We wonder whether she is hiding difficulty" invites observation. "She masks all day" sounds settled before the evidence has been compared.
Gather the child's account in a usable form
"How was school?" asks a tired child to retrieve and summarise an entire day. Try narrower questions at a time when they have enough capacity.
- Which part took the most energy?
- Was there a time you did not understand but stayed quiet?
- When did you copy what another pupil was doing?
- Was there somewhere you could stop performing or talking?
- What happened just before you felt you had had enough?
- What made one lesson easier today?
Some children communicate more accurately through a timetable, drawing, colour scale, voice note or choices. A child may say little and still show a pattern through which days or places they avoid.
Do not question them immediately after school if that is their least available time. Do not ask them to exaggerate or display distress so adults will believe them. Record their words accurately and distinguish a direct quotation from your summary.
Keep a small comparison record
Choose one question and a limited period, perhaps two school weeks. Record only information relevant to that question.
| School context | School account | Child's account | What happens afterwards | Easier occasion or support |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monday lunch | Entered hall and returned to class | "I stood by the wall until the queue went" | Did not eat until 5pm; silent in car | Ate on Thursday when allowed in early |
| English writing | Completed one page | Copied sentence openings from the board | Cried when homework mentioned | Began more easily when given a model |
Include the source of each fact. "Teacher email" and "parent observation" are clearer than a merged narrative.
Record easier days. If you collect only the worst events, the meeting cannot compare what changed. An absence of an obvious pattern is also useful and may suggest that the question needs widening.
The record-keeping guide gives a fuller template without asking you to document family life indefinitely.
Ask school to observe the access, not the performance
A planned observation should answer a question. "Watch her more" is too broad.
Ask the observer to note:
- when the instruction is given and how the child responds;
- whether they begin independently, after watching peers or after adult prompts;
- whether they ask for help when stuck;
- how much work is completed and how it is produced;
- signs of effort such as constant checking, rigid copying or repeated self-correction;
- what happens during transition into and out of the task;
- any support already present;
- a comparable occasion that goes more easily.
Do not assume a formal visitor will see an ordinary day. The presence of another adult can change teaching, behaviour and anxiety. Routine teacher observations and the child's report remain important.
Look beyond grades and completed work
A child can attain well and still have an unmet need. Ask what the result required.
Perhaps work is accurate because the child spends twice as long, skips lunch to finish, repeatedly checks or receives prompts not reflected in the grade. Perhaps homework is completed only because a parent reteaches the lesson. Perhaps attendance is currently high because the family is using an unsustainable morning process.
Relevant effects may include:
- inability to eat, drink or use the toilet at school;
- headaches, stomach pain or exhaustion;
- loss of speech or interaction after school;
- long recovery before ordinary family activity is possible;
- sleep disruption before particular days;
- reduced attendance or increasing lateness;
- giving up activities the child previously valued;
- believing that needing help means failure.
These signs still need careful interpretation. They show impact, not a single cause.
Turn the information into a trial
Choose a support linked to the possible barrier.
If spoken uncertainty is the question, test written instructions and a private clarification route. If lunchtime density is the question, test a different entry time or eating space. If constant social performance is the question, identify a genuinely low-demand place or activity where the child need not converse.
Agree:
- where and when the change applies;
- how the child will access it;
- who will ensure it happens;
- what school will observe;
- what family and child will notice;
- the review date.
Review both school access and later cost. A pupil completing the same work with less prompting and recovering more quickly at home is a different result from completing the work while after-school distress increases.
If school still sees no concern
Ask for the school's conclusion in precise terms.
Does the school consider that my child is accessing this part of the day without additional support? What information led to that conclusion? How were their view and the impact after school considered?
You may disagree without claiming bad faith. Ask whether another teacher, the SENCO or pastoral lead can compare the same questions. Share the one-page summary rather than a large unstructured folder.
In England, the SEND Code says assessment should draw on the pupil's view, parents' experience, teacher assessments and relevant outside advice, and that parents' concerns should be recorded and compared with school information [1]. Other UK nations use different processes but also place weight on the child and family being involved.
If there is continuing functional impact, ask what support can be tried now and whether further educational or health assessment is appropriate. The goal is not to make school witness a meltdown. It is to make the child's access, effort and recovery visible enough to plan from.
Prepare the one-page comparison
Before the meeting, reduce the information to five short sections.
- Question: Name the part of school you are trying to understand.
- School information: Include what staff have directly reported, including successful participation.
- Child information: Use the child's words or clearly label your summary.
- Home impact: Give two or three dated examples and an easier comparison.
- Next test: Suggest an observation or support trial and a review date.
For example:
Question: What does independent writing require from A in the final lesson? School reports that A completes the expected amount and rarely asks for help. A says, "I wait until somebody else starts and copy the shape." At home after three of the last five final-lesson writing days, A did not speak during the journey and could not begin the evening routine for more than an hour. On the day the teacher provided a model and a written first step, A reported knowing what to do and recovered within 20 minutes. Request: observe how A enters independent writing and test the written first step for four weeks.
The summary does not diagnose masking or tell the school that its observations are false. It makes the unexplained difference concrete enough to investigate.
Agree who will see the document. Remove unrelated private family detail and other children's names. If the child wants part of their account kept from a wider group, discuss how the essential support information can be shared while respecting that boundary, unless safety requires a different response.
Sources
Sources and further reading
- [1] Department for Education and Department of Health and Social Care. SEND code of practice: 0 to 25 years. January 2015; page updated September 2024 (accessed 4 August 2026).
- [2] Education Endowment Foundation. Special Educational Needs in Mainstream Schools. March 2020 (accessed 4 August 2026).
